Pay rent to people evicted from homes near Tansa pipeline: Bombay HC

The Bombay HC has ordered the state government to pay each family Rs 15,000 per month by way of rent, to people who forfeited their right to a tenement in Mahul, after their homes along the Tansa pipeline were demolished

The Bombay High Court, on April 3, 2019, directed the Maharashtra government to pay Rs 15,000 per month as rent to people who were rendered homeless after their dwellings, located near a key water pipeline in Mumbai, were demolished. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), in compliance with a previous high court order, has been demolishing unauthorised buildings, including residential and commercial structures, along the Tansa water pipeline that runs across nine administrative wards of the city.

The government had decided to accommodate the displaced persons in Mahul village in the metropolis’ suburbs but some of them have refused to move there, citing high air pollution levels due to oil refineries in the nearby areas. As many as 7,000 families have been affected by the ongoing demolition drive and only 225 of them have shifted to Mahul, an industrial area in the eastern part of Mumbai. The affected people had relied on an observation made by the Mumbai bench of the National Green Tribunal about pollution levels in Mahul in a related matter.

See also: BMC serves notice to commercial establishments in Mumbai’s iconic Esplanade Mansion

A division bench of justices AS Oka and MS Sanklecha, in its order on April 3, 2019, noted that the government cannot force any person to live in a polluted area. “Article 21 of the constitution of India says every citizen has the right to live in a pollution-free area. Project-affected persons have the right to say that they cannot be forced to reside in an area where air pollution is life-threatening,” the court said. “As these persons were evicted and if rehabilitation is not done in a correct spirit, then, it will affect their rights guaranteed under the Indian constitution,” it noted.

“As the state government has expressed inability to provide alternate tenements, the only option left is to direct the government to pay the project-affected persons monetary compensation, to enable them to find their own accommodation,” the judges observed. The bench directed the state to initiate communication with all the eligible persons and find out if they would prefer staying in Mahul or take money from the government. “The government shall pay each family Rs 15,000 per month along with Rs 45,000 refundable deposit by way of rent, for those persons who choose to forfeit their right to a tenement in Mahul,” the bench said. The families will then have a month to vacate their structures, after which the BMC shall resume demolition work, the judges said. “A similar practice shall be initiated with those persons, who have already started staying in Mahul. These persons shall be given the option to vacate the flats occupied by them and take the rent amount,” the court said.

The court said the government shall deposit a sum of Rs 1.80 lakhs (Rs 15,000 per month for a year) along with the Rs 45,000 deposit in the bank accounts of the project-affected persons (PAPs). “After a year, a sum of Rs 15,000 shall be deposited in these persons’ bank accounts, before the fifth of each month,” the court directed. The bench asked the corporation to complete the demolition process by November 30, 2019. In its order, the court said the government’s failure to make available accommodation to the PAPs has resulted in thousands of illegal structures still encroaching upon the city’s main water pipelines. “The entire difficulty has arisen, because of delay on the part of the state government to rehabilitate the project-affected persons,” it said.

The bench noted that such encroachments affect the entire population of Mumbai, which gets their water supply from these pipelines. Referring to previous court orders, the bench said, “The encroachments also increase risk and make the pipelines vulnerable to terrorist attacks. The issue involves security of Mumbai, which has experienced some of the worst terrorist attacks in the past, the judges noted. “If not for the project-affected persons but at least for the safety of the 1.80 crore population of Mumbai, the state government should come up with an alternate plan,” the court said.

Comments

comments