IBC should be the last resort to deal with housing projects: Panel

A government panel has suggested many ways to deal with stuck housing projects in the country.

September 1, 2023: The insolvency and bankruptcy code (IBC) should be used as the last resort to resolve cases pertaining to struck housing projects, a government panel has recommended.

The committee, which was constituted under the chairmanship of Amitabh Kant, to recommend ways to complete the legacy stalled real estate projects, also suggested that state governments/ builders/ bankers/ buyers/land authorities should avoid further litigation in cases where judgments of the Supreme Court have been received.

The panel also said that even though the real estate law mandates project registration, this provision needed to be strictly enforced to ensure accountability and transparency.  This, the panel suggested could be done by way of “waiving pre-requisites and penalty/fines”.

 

Other key suggestion of the panel

Execution of registration/sub-lease deeds for all occupied units: The committee recommended an immediate registration or execution of sub-leases in favour of homebuyers who have occupied the property. This should not be linked to the recovery of dues from the builders. It would benefit approximately about one lakh homebuyers. The panel also recommended that strict action should be initiated simultaneously to recover the outstanding dues from defaulting builders. In cases where the homebuyers are expected to remit outstanding dues to the builders, the committee suggests that the RERA should directly collect these payments from homebuyers.

Occupancy/possession of all completed projects: The panel recommended that regulatory authorities should identify such projects for resolution where construction is substantially completed but the possession remains undelivered for want of no-objection certificates or completion certificates.  The committee further recommends that the clearance process, including the occupation and completion certificates for these projects, should be expedited, irrespective of whether developers have paid their dues to the authorities.

Proposal for state government’s rehabilitation package: The committee recommended that states may announce a rehabilitation package for stalled projects to make these projects financially viable.

Framework for RERA and administrator-led revival of projects: The committee recommended that in cases where the developer did not take responsibility for completing the project under the package or failed to do so, those may be dealt with by a RERA-led revival framework. In case homebuyers propose to complete the project themselves, they should be accorded preference. Under this framework, the committee suggests equitable haircuts among all stakeholders and the entire process from administrator appointment to bid awarding to be completed within not more than six months.

Financing of stalled projects: The panel recommended that financing for completing the projects may be treated as priority financing and SWAMIH fund should proactively provide finance for completing these stalled projects.

 

Got any questions or point of view on our article? We would love to hear from you. Write to our Editor-in-Chief Jhumur Ghosh at [email protected]

 

Was this article useful?
  • 😃 (0)
  • 😐 (0)
  • 😔 (0)

Recent Podcasts

  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 45Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 45
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 44Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 44
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 43Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 43
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 42Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 42
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 41Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 41
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 40Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 40