Nobody can encroach upon property in charity’s name: Delhi HC

Encroachment on public property in the name of doing charity is not permissible, the Delhi High Court observed, while expressing its displeasure over unauthorised construction in a graveyard

The Delhi High Court, on November 27, 2017, rejected the claim of a person, accused of carrying out unauthorised construction on a Waqf property, that an orphanage was being run in the premises, housing over 70 children and that no commercial activity was going on there. “You cannot encroach, even to house other people. Charity begins at home. So, do charity at your home. You cannot encroach upon the property of others and say we are doing charity. It is not permissible,” a bench of acting chief justice Gita Mittal and justice C Hari Shankar said.

The bench said mere occupation and trespass make no legal right. “Nowhere in the world can you file a suit and say I am an encroacher and I want my right over the property. What education are you providing to students, with your admitted trespass? The land belongs to this country and you expect sympathy from us. It is like stealing somebody’s money and saying I am distributing it among poor people,” the court said. The judiciary also pulled up the civic authorities for allowing unauthorised construction, stating, “You permit people to encroach and then seek adjournment to file reply.”

See also: HC raps Delhi government for not evicting Waqf property encroachers

The bench was hearing a PIL by a residents welfare association of Hazrat Nizamuddin Basti, seeking direction to the Delhi Waqf Board, the centre, the Delhi government and the Delhi police, to take action against an individual and Jamia Arabia Nizamia Welfare Education Society. The society is accused of carrying out unauthorised construction on public land, housing a graveyard, a mosque and a dome-type structure, situated on the main Mathura Road in the national capital. The court directed the authorities to file its response to the plea and a report on the inspection of the site. It listed the matter for January 12, 2018.

The petition in the case had claimed that any construction in the graveyard hurts religious sentiments and was a cognisable offence, under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It also said that illegal construction could not be allowed in the garb of managing affairs of a mosque or graveyard, or to convert a public land into a private property for self-interest. The petition had also sought a direction to the authorities, to remove the unauthorised construction and to the Delhi Waqf Board, to manage the premises.

 

Was this article useful?
  • 😃 (0)
  • 😐 (0)
  • 😔 (0)

Recent Podcasts

  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 45Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 45
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 44Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 44
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 43Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 43
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 42Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 42
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 41Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 41
  • Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 40Keeping it Real: Housing.com podcast Episode 40